Super-Earths Could Be More ‘Superhabitable’ Than Planets Like Ours
Kepler-62f, an exoplanet that is about 40% larger than Earth. It’s located about 1,200 light-years from our solar system in the constellation Lyra. Image: NASA/Ames/JPL-Caltech
Alien planets that are slightly bigger than Earth could be more life-friendly than exoplanets closer to our own size, a new study implies. These so-called “super-Earths” that are about two to three times that of our own planet could be “superhabitable” — implying that our own planet is a rare bird indeed when it comes to being good for life.
Bigger rocky planets would have a host of advantages, argue McMaster University’s Rene Heller and Weber State University’s John Armstrong in a paper recently published in Astrobiology. Among them: These worlds would have tectonic activity that takes longer to happen, meaning that the conditions would be more stable for life. Also, a bigger mass implies it’s easier to hang on to a thick atmosphere and to have “enhanced magnetic shielding” to hold a planet’s own against solar flares.
“Our argumentation can be understood as a refutation of the Rare Earth hypothesis. Ward and Brownlee (2000) claimed that the emergence of life required an extremely unlikely interplay of conditions on Earth, and they concluded that complex life would be a very unlikely phenomenon in the Universe,” stated the authors in their paper “Superhabitable Worlds.”
“While we agree that the occurrence of another truly Earth-like planet is trivially impossible, we hold that this argument does not constrain the emergence of other inhabited planets. We argue here in the opposite direction and claim that Earth could turn out to be a marginally habitable world. In our view, a variety of processes exists that can make environmental conditions on a planet or moon more benign to life than is the case on Earth.”
As a start, the scientists suggest looking at the Alpha Centauri system, where researchers in 2012 discovered a planet close to Earth’s size that is likely not habitable because it orbits so close to its sun.
The star system, however, is about the right age and has low enough radiation to allow life to occur on a planet or moon that “evolved similarly as it did on Earth”, providing the planet or moon “had the chance to collect water from comets and planetesimals beyond the snowline.” Further, it’s just four light-years from Earth, making it a good target for telescopic observations.
Further reading:
(via blessphemy)
melocosmos reblogged this from taiyokei
melocosmos liked this
miquelpuig liked this err0rose reblogged this from scifinspiration
err0rose liked this
nicholaspwildeblog liked this
cindarin liked this
charmycharmcharms liked this
melwicker liked this
4astronomy reblogged this from taiyokei
thesanewhitaker reblogged this from firefaerie81
firefaerie81 reblogged this from sailorshadow
vengefulblue liked this
mulderandskrully-archive liked this
ncc-17zer01 reblogged this from theofficialstarfleet
inferno427 reblogged this from sirhate
conlainn liked this
asteroidarsonist reblogged this from transgaygender
scoutoftherings liked this sirhate reblogged this from transgaygender
cryptexe reblogged this from revolutionary-stationary
cryptexe liked this
super-blender-universe reblogged this from transgaygender
super-blender-universe liked this
transgaygender reblogged this from theofficialstarfleet
transgaygender liked this prozacandfaith reblogged this from vespidphoenix
vespidphoenix reblogged this from stuffwithbits
stuffwithbits reblogged this from sleighswithbells
whatsup-a-m-n-blog liked this
femmeyemmy reblogged this from moniquill
theulumuri reblogged this from joasakura
godisdelfin liked this
katschy liked this
janae-marre reblogged this from joasakura
janae-marre liked this
floofyfrivolity reblogged this from save-the-innocent
- Show more notes
