quoms:

When I met Eva late last year, she looked smart in a jean jacket with a neatly tied silk scarf around her neck, small dangly earrings and cropped curly hair. Over the course of the last 44 years, as she continued to teach English to fifth through eighth grades, Eva’s rent increased almost fivefold, to 270 euros from 55, but her wages increased more than 20-fold, to 3,375 euros a month from 150. Viennese law dictates that rents in public housing can increase only with inflation, and only when the year’s inflation exceeds 5 percent. By the time she retired in 2007, Eva’s rent was only 8 percent of her income. Because her husband was earning 4,000 euros a month, their rent amounted to 3.6 percent of their incomes combined.

That’s about what Vienna was aiming for back in 1919, when the city began planning its world-famous municipal housing, known as the Gemeindebauten. Before World War I, Vienna had some of the worst housing conditions in Europe, Eve Blau notes in her book, “The Architecture of Red Vienna.” Many working-class families had to take on subtenants or bed tenants (day and night workers who slept in the same bed at different times) in order to pay their rent. But from 1923 to 1934, in a period known as Red Vienna, the ruling Social Democratic Party built 64,000 new units in 400 housing blocks, increasing the city’s housing supply by about 10 percent. Some 200,000 people, one-tenth of the population, were rehoused in these buildings, with rents set at 3.5 percent of the average semiskilled worker’s income, enough to cover the cost of maintenance and operation.

Experts refer to Vienna’s Gemeindebauten as “social housing,” a phrase that captures how the city’s public housing and other limited-profit housing are a widely shared social benefit: The Gemeindebauten welcome the middle class, not just the poor. In Vienna, a whopping 80 percent of residents qualify for public housing, and once you have a contract, it never expires, even if you get richer. Housing experts believe that this approach leads to greater economic diversity within public housing — and better outcomes for the people living in it. […]

Keep reading

(via averyterrible)

  1. amongthefallingstars reblogged this from thatdiabolicalfeminist
  2. shinladyanarki reblogged this from max1461
  3. radically-groovy reblogged this from femme-feytale
  4. vartoc reblogged this from zeedesertfox
  5. femme-feytale reblogged this from catgirltoes
  6. haldaisilme reblogged this from everlastingrandom
  7. bribearoh reblogged this from publiusmaximum
  8. raindancejodi reblogged this from that-g3-obsessive
  9. that-g3-obsessive reblogged this from everlastingrandom
  10. revcleo reblogged this from bill-blake-fans-anonymous
  11. rancidroy reblogged this from leonspardas
  12. indignantbarista reblogged this from the-grey-hunt
  13. the-grey-hunt reblogged this from sleepnoises
  14. maybenotboring reblogged this from flavorcountry
  15. sexyblasphemy reblogged this from etheraltimelessbeautybouquet
  16. etheraltimelessbeautybouquet reblogged this from quoms
  17. jazzapples3 reblogged this from camdennightingale
  18. kindfulkirby reblogged this from andmaybegayer
  19. thejadedjester reblogged this from zoruawithagun
  20. camdennightingale reblogged this from uupiic
  21. bellowingwhack reblogged this from andmaybegayer
  22. just-complete-trash reblogged this from andmaybegayer
  23. uupiic reblogged this from vivacia-18
  24. zoruawithagun reblogged this from andmaybegayer
  25. quoms posted this
    Worldwide, housing has become a nightmare of expense and speculation. What did Vienna do right?
Short URL for this post: https://tmblr.co/ZFlf2tdtk1aZqW00