elodieunderglass:

elodieunderglass:

image


Hey, today I learned that my catalogued lack of dating experience is cited in an academic paper

Jokes aside, this quote is how the researchers kick off an exploration of the under-researched concept of “friends to partners” with a call to social researchers to reframe their (apparently exclusive) focus on “dating” as the sole initiating event of romantic relationships. It’s actually a very interesting paper; apparently social scientists and pop culture focus their attention on the process of “dating”, a frankly heteronormative lens that insists on very specific behaviours and scenarios, in which single people market themselves to each other at bars. Meanwhile, in the actual people surveyed in the study, it appears far more common for people to prefer “friends to lovers” as a relationship pathway.

“Our research reveals that relationship initiation studies published in popular journals (Study 1) and cited in popular textbooks (Study 2) overwhelmingly focus on romance that sparks between strangers and largely overlook romance that develops between friends. This limited focus might be justified if friends-first initiation was rare or undesirable, but our research reveals the opposite. In a meta-analysis of seven samples of university students and crowdsourced adults (Study 3; N = 1,897), two thirds reported friends-first initiation, and friends-first initiation was the preferred method of initiation among university students (Study 4). These studies affirm that friends-first initiation is a prevalent and preferred method of romantic relationship initiation that has been overlooked by relationship science. We discuss possible reasons for this oversight and consider the implications for dominant theories of relationship initiation.”

Like holy cow did you guys KNOW that relationship science was dominated by studies on dating? A thing that in which good grades are not possible to achieve?

And it’s kind of good for ME to hear as well! As a (weird queer) person, dating always seemed so artificial and undesirable to me, but so important to everyone else, that it was clearly just One Of Those Things that is programmed into the Normal Hetero Brain that folks like me simply miss out on, forever. But possibly not! Possibly “dating” is one of those heavily marketed products that nobody particularly wants. Like the Metaverse. And nobody, until these plucky social scientists, has been brave enough to call it out!!


But yes. At the expense of elodie glass’s dating history being notably sparse (Stinson, 2021).

(via creekfiend)

  1. mchid reblogged this from elodieunderglass
  2. tenderfacemeat reblogged this from 0x5742
  3. 0x5742 reblogged this from torqued-queer
  4. angelysalt reblogged this from namara-ashina
  5. fritzmoldanstein reblogged this from maggi-cube
  6. maggi-cube reblogged this from namara-ashina
  7. hotshot9 reblogged this from eliduremaybe
  8. lindenforest reblogged this from elodieunderglass
  9. eliduremaybe reblogged this from namara-ashina
  10. namara-ashina reblogged this from imagine-my-otp
  11. imagine-my-otp reblogged this from frederbee
  12. frederbee reblogged this from itsabadhobbit
  13. olivexed reblogged this from paintediamond
  14. just-some-stufff reblogged this from benedictusantonius
  15. coffeefrenchandhistory reblogged this from benedictusantonius
  16. benedictusantonius reblogged this from the-warrior-poet
  17. paintediamond reblogged this from calico-arctique
  18. calico-arctique reblogged this from elodieunderglass
  19. hikineet-trash reblogged this from elodieunderglass
  20. adaftpunk reblogged this from peacewithans
  21. nonena reblogged this from elodieunderglass
  22. northerwanderer reblogged this from shiniesandqueershit
Short URL for this post: https://tmblr.co/ZFlf2tcrhL0Umq00