Worse still, even if we had the ability to take a snapshot of all of the brain’s 86 billion neurons and then to simulate the state of those neurons in a computer, that vast pattern would mean nothing outside the body of the brain that produced it. This is perhaps the most egregious way in which the IP metaphor has distorted our thinking about human functioning. Whereas computers do store exact copies of data – copies that can persist unchanged for long periods of time, even if the power has been turned off – the brain maintains our intellect only as long as it remains alive. There is no on-off switch. Either the brain keeps functioning, or we disappear. What’s more, as the neurobiologist Steven Rose pointed out in The Future of the Brain (2005), a snapshot of the brain’s current state might also be meaningless unless we knew the entire life history of that brain’s owner – perhaps even about the social context in which he or she was raised.
Think how difficult this problem is. To understand even the basics of how the brain maintains the human intellect, we might need to know not just the current state of all 86 billion neurons and their 100 trillion interconnections, not just the varying strengths with which they are connected, and not just the states of more than 1,000 proteins that exist at each connection point, but how the moment-to-moment activity of the brain contributes to the integrity of the system. Add to this the uniqueness of each brain, brought about in part because of the uniqueness of each person’s life history, and Kandel’s prediction starts to sound overly optimistic. (In a recent op-ed in The New York Times, the neuroscientist Kenneth Miller suggested it will take ‘centuries’ just to figure out basic neuronal connectivity.)
Meanwhile, vast sums of money are being raised for brain research, based in some cases on faulty ideas and promises that cannot be kept. The most blatant instance of neuroscience gone awry, documented recently in a report in Scientific American, concerns the $1.3 billion Human Brain Project launched by the European Union in 2013. Convinced by the charismatic Henry Markram that he could create a simulation of the entire human brain on a supercomputer by the year 2023, and that such a model would revolutionise the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease and other disorders, EU officials funded his project with virtually no restrictions. Less than two years into it, the project turned into a ‘brain wreck’, and Markram was asked to step down.
(via screamydreamy)
stilitana liked this
xhanjisungiex liked this inspo-reblorb reblogged this from darkkpastels
cyphyree liked this
drumptrash liked this
darkkpastels reblogged this from probablyasocialecologist
fferthe liked this
nickisnothereeither liked this urchinteeth liked this
3aaaasha liked this
cigarettefaggot liked this zabreus liked this
run-wilde liked this
the-tzimisce liked this
wrdeater reblogged this from queer-flesh-simulacrum
the-most-pathetic-edge-marquis liked this
ifoundmybeatingheartagain liked this wrdeater liked this
queer-flesh-simulacrum reblogged this from probablyasocialecologist
queer-flesh-simulacrum liked this
chai-teaaa liked this
boxheadpaint liked this
tamagotri liked this
sedatedbloodjunkie liked this
tinyfingernail liked this
vampsmmgoob liked this nievesfernandez reblogged this from probablyasocialecologist
pisscob liked this
englishlaboratory liked this
moonchild--blog liked this
daydreampartaker reblogged this from probablyasocialecologist
la3perce3neige3 liked this calcificare reblogged this from starfru3t
slurpem liked this
starfru3t reblogged this from dataprincess
starfru3t liked this dataprincess reblogged this from fabledfear
moonssugar liked this
ichigona liked this keytopeaceblog liked this
iced-coffee-kid liked this
mirbinnie liked this
deadstrides liked this nievesfernandez liked this
schigeo liked this
- Show more notes