Jokes aside, this quote is how the researchers kick off an exploration of the under-researched concept of “friends to partners” with a call to social researchers to reframe their (apparently exclusive) focus on “dating” as the sole initiating event of romantic relationships. It’s actually a very interesting paper; apparently social scientists and pop culture focus their attention on the process of “dating”, a frankly heteronormative lens that insists on very specific behaviours and scenarios, in which single people market themselves to each other at bars. Meanwhile, in the actual people surveyed in the study, it appears far more common for people to prefer “friends to lovers” as a relationship pathway.
“Our research reveals that relationship initiation studies published in popular journals (Study 1) and cited in popular textbooks (Study 2) overwhelmingly focus on romance that sparks between strangers and largely overlook romance that develops between friends. This limited focus might be justified if friends-first initiation was rare or undesirable, but our research reveals the opposite. In a meta-analysis of seven samples of university students and crowdsourced adults (Study 3; N = 1,897), two thirds reported friends-first initiation, and friends-first initiation was the preferred method of initiation among university students (Study 4). These studies affirm that friends-first initiation is a prevalent and preferred method of romantic relationship initiation that has been overlooked by relationship science. We discuss possible reasons for this oversight and consider the implications for dominant theories of relationship initiation.”
Like holy cow did you guys KNOW that relationship science was dominated by studies on dating? A thing that in which good grades are not possible to achieve?
And it’s kind of good for ME to hear as well! As a (weird queer) person, dating always seemed so artificial and undesirable to me, but so important to everyone else, that it was clearly just One Of Those Things that is programmed into the Normal Hetero Brain that folks like me simply miss out on, forever. But possibly not! Possibly “dating” is one of those heavily marketed products that nobody particularly wants. Like the Metaverse. And nobody, until these plucky social scientists, has been brave enough to call it out!!
But yes. At the expense of elodie glass’s dating history being notably sparse (Stinson, 2021).
I try to take glaze-notes when I’m trying a new thing/think that a certain colour combo/technique will be something I want to replicate going forwards (eg. I want to try & replicate the blue/purple sheen on a crow by slapping one of my blue celadons over the black sgraffito & have purposely noted some glaze/slip/clay combos on this batch that might be useful for that).
They always end up a total mess because somehow I’m always in a bit/a lot of a rush glazing, but so far future me has been able to read them, so that’s what matters. Also my quick-as-possible portraits of each beast make me laugh, so that’s an added bonus!
With its bare, pink face and bright orange-red bill with a peacock blue base, Trigonoceps occipitalis (Accipitridae) is one of Africa’s most colorful vultures. This is also the most solitary of the African vultures, usually seen singly or in pairs in mixed deciduous and broad-leaved woodland, rather than in semi-arid thorn veld. Its distribution closely tracks that of the Baobab, Adansonia digitata, which is a favorite nest tree
Assessed as Vulnerable by the IUCN, the White-headed Vulture is threatened by reductions in populations of medium-sized mammals and wild ungulates, on whose carcasses they feed, and the loss of suitable habitat.
i just can’t get over the guy on reddit who has a human-sized roach girl fetish & even an imaginary roach girlfriend. i just go on with my life then randomly remember the lines “i wouldn’t be disgusted of her (roach gf) unlike the characters in Metamorphosis. i would take care of her.” & lose my shit
Another day on “weird but not hurting anybody” side of the internet
