sonofbaldwin:
“ knowledgeequalsblackpower:
“ dhaarijmens:
“ bemusedlybespectacled:
“ washingtonpost:
“ In a post-Ferguson world, Americans increasingly doubt the notion of colorblind justice.
”
HOW THE FUCK DID THE PERCENTAGE GO UP FOR WHITE...

sonofbaldwin:

knowledgeequalsblackpower:

dhaarijmens:

bemusedlybespectacled:

washingtonpost:

In a post-Ferguson world, Americans increasingly doubt the notion of colorblind justice.

HOW THE FUCK DID THE PERCENTAGE GO UP FOR WHITE PEOPLE

IN WHAT UNIVERSE DOES A POLICE OFFICER SHOOTING AN UNARMED BLACK KID (AND THEN ATTEMPTING TO COVER IT UP AFTER THE FACT) CONSTITUTE EQUAL TREATMENT IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM

LIKE WHO LOOKS AT THAT AND GOES “WELL, BEFORE I THOUGHT THAT THERE WAS RACISM IN OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM, BUT THEN THIS SHIT HAPPENED AND NOW I SEE THAT IT’S PERFECTLY EQUAL”

WHAT THE FUCK

This increase can be explained by an interesting social phenomenon called ‘denial.’

They benefit from not knowing.. and from believing in myths. 

Comparing beliefs before and after Michael Brown’s murder and the surrounding revelations of racism that have sprung out of it, white people, as a demographic believe, MORE THAN EVER BEFORE, that the criminal justice system treats whites and blacks equally.

That is, MORE white people believe the criminal justice system treats black equally now than they did before Michael Brown’s death.

In essence, for white people, blatant systemic oppression and the murder of an unarmed young black man gives them even more reason to believe blacks are treated fairly by the system.

This confirms an earlier study that said the more you tell white people that the system is inherently racist, the more they supported harsher punishments for black people: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/08/07/3468368/study-white-people-support-harsher-criminal-laws-if-they-think-more-black-people-are-arrested/

Marinate on these inhumanities for a second.

(via gailsimone)

breakingnews:
“Rain falls on Hong Kong’s #UmbrellaRevolution
SCMP: Protesters in Hong Kong have defied heavy rain as they continue to gather on the eve of China’s October 1st National Day, a major public holiday celebrated across the country, to...

breakingnews:

Rain falls on Hong Kong’s #UmbrellaRevolution

SCMP: Protesters in Hong Kong have defied heavy rain as they continue to gather on the eve of China’s October 1st National Day, a major public holiday celebrated across the country, to protest the city’s embattled chief executive and to fight for democratic elections.

Photo: Rain falls on Hong Kong’s Causeway Bay (Felix Wong)

(via carazelaya)

(via nymphgut)

asker

raputacastleinthesky-deactivate asked: Hey I was wondering how you got yourself such a cool pet. I've always wanted either a raven or crow as a pet and I was wondering if you've got any info on where you got your beautiful bird and how I can get myself one. Thanks. And look! I didn't ask anything about your sexuality. :P Have a lovely day.

dangerscissor:

gryffon:

ok! i get asks like these sometimes and i give a similar answer every time. here we go for round THREE!

first and foremost, i am here to say i do not support the practice of keeping crows/ravens as pets, especially by unlicensed, untrained and uneducated individuals. ms. crow is not my pet. i’ve been a volunteer at nature connection for two, maybe two and a half years. my work is to ‘socialize’ ms. crow, which means spending lots of one-on-one time with her to acclimate her to being around people, since she is part of the educational presentations nature connection gives and needs to be comfortable around people. i feed her, i talk with her, i sing to her, i clean her cage, and i just hang out with her. i am blessed to have this opportunity.

a bird that could not survive on its own that comes into your care is a different story, but even then i strongly advise transferring the bird’s care to a wildlife rescue or rehabilitation facility near you, consulting with a vet (warning, vets may suggest euthanization), and as a last case scenario - applying for a wildlife rehabilitation permit. which takes a while.

it is important you research the laws surrounding rehabilitating and caring for wildlife in your state. i live in massachusetts. certain species do not require a permit to care for, and i’m pretty sure it’s different in every state. here’s some info for florida which provides a list and general should-knows in a clear format.

in my state, there are some qualifications needed.

The Wildlife Center conducts course about the field of wildlife rehabilitation.  This seven week course provides basic information about the process of becoming a wildlife rehabilitator, about the biology of selected groups of animals, and introduces participants to the skills necessary to conduct successful wildlife care.  (This course does not provide you with a permit to conduct wildlife rehabilitation.  Those permits are administered by the Massachusetts Department of Fisheries and Wildlife in accordance with 321 CMR 2.13 and by the United States Department of Fish and Wildlife.)

i’m pretty sure you also need to show you have decent facilities to care for the animal needed. they need ample room to fly, they need lots of stimulation. crows are not house pets. crows will not do well in a house. they are territorial. they are loud. they are mischievous. they are smart, and they will wreck your shit and take craps on everything you hold near and dear to your sweet little heart. they are notoriously intelligent, and they require specialized knowledge to care for. they require massive amounts of time, energy, attention, resources and money. crows are not domesticated. crows are not pets, they are companions, and owning one will change your life. you need to dedicate yourself and build your life around the bird’s needs.

i could go on about this forever.

but i understand the appeal! its the same sort of people who want wolfdogs or foxes - they’re novel, they’re unusual in a household, they’re exotic but not too exotic, you see cute pictures and videos and you’re like “oh man thats so cool i want one”. i’m part of the problem here, it’s not like i put a big fucking disclaimer on every one of my videos or pictures saying “CROWS ARE NOT GOOD PETS”. people see my gifs, my pictures, my videos and they go “i want one!!”. i see it allll the time in tags.

so i need to reiterate this a lot. but the point is that this lens that you’re looking through the animals at, this “novelty, property, cool accessory” lens is not good. it actually kills animals. this isn’t crow related, but non-wolfdogs does a great job of talking about why this sort of behavior and mindset can be extremely harmful.

i should also note some interesting statistics on parrots, which are similar to crows in the fact that they are non-domesticated, intelligent birds that people buy because of their novelty and acclaimed intelligence, and also their accessibility. any old schmuck can walk into a pet store and come out with a conure. it’s difficult to get concrete statistics on these issues, since bird abuse is rarely reported. IDA states,

Parrots are highly intelligent and hypersensitive emotionally and physically. Improper handling can teach an already fearful or aggressive bird, or even a tame and loving bird, to bite and become aggressive. This can not only cause the bird serious psychological, stress related problems, it can also dramatically affect his/her physical health. Learned aggressive behavior from mishandling is one of the primary reasons parrots are surrendered or sold and live in at least five homes before dying prematurely or finding their forever home.

The parrots’ wild traits don’t usually mesh well in people’s homes or even in outside aviaries. The third most popular pet in America is one of the most frustrating, destructive, messy, and noisy pets a person can have, increasing the odds that the birds will be abused and neglected, and rehomed. Yet, pet stores rarely offer these facts to their customers prior to purchase.

It’s only after the bird arrives home, and the excitement has worn off, is the unsuspecting consumer hard hit with the reality of parrot parenthood. The additional cleaning, the destruction of personal property, “sudden” biting and behavior problems, and the continual screaming are more than most people can tolerate. As a result, some parrots are forced to live their entire lives in closets, garages, and basements, or in makeshift, outdoor cages and aviaries, subjecting the bird to the elements and unsuitable weather and dangerous predators. Others pass the bird onto other unsuspecting consumers without a word of caution. It is estimated that the majority of all captive parrots eventually end up in at least five homes before suffering and dying prematurely.

dude, not gonna lie, i want a crow. but if i look at that interest through a critical lens, its a selfish interest. it is not the right thing to do. its an impossibility for me, money-wise, time-wise, and yknow. crow-wise. it would be illegal, unless i went out to a breeder and purchased one of the few species legal to own without a permit in the US. just because they are legal to own without a permit does not make them any different in their needs.

if you really must know. african pied crows are legal to own in the U.S. you can purchase one from a breeder, for around $1500. if you purchase a healthy bird from a breeder who is willing to sell, just know i’m going to be side-eyeing you so fucking hard.

the best thing you can do is donate or volunteer your time to rescue/rehabilitation facilities and sanctuaries near you.

further reading: http://www.avianwelfare.org/issues/overview.htm

one of my crow posts is going around again and i feel like this is an important post to have on my front page right now

  • mulder: (is in the pool with his hands cupped around something) scully look i found an alien
  • scully: bullshit let me see (leans in real close)
  • mulder: (squirts her in the face with pool water) hows that for proof you harpy

moonfalora:

rexuality:

a person complaining about puns basically invites every pun enthusiast in the vicinity to come snapping rhythmically from the shadows 

image

(via egrizzzzzzzzzzzz)

yungmethuselah:
“This image appears in my head whenever I encounter people who advocate self-expression through art as a form of therapy.
”

yungmethuselah:

This image appears in my head whenever I encounter people who advocate self-expression through art as a form of therapy.

poliakoff:
“ Now that’s a proper business hug.
”

poliakoff:

Now that’s a proper business hug.

(via bowiesnippleantennae)

missybird:
“ Gabfest with your best ghoul on a Friday night, what a purrfect way to spend the evening.
”

missybird:

Gabfest with your best ghoul on a Friday night, what a purrfect way to spend the evening.

(via vvizardz)

kingcheddarxvii:
“Not the heroes we thought we needed but the heroes we really needed all along
”

kingcheddarxvii:

Not the heroes we thought we needed but the heroes we really needed all along

(via wyomings)

So anyway, I was having this argument with my father about Martin Luther King and how his message was too conservative compared to Malcolm X’s message. My father got really angry at me. It wasn’t that he disliked Malcolm X, but his point was that Malcolm X hadn’t accomplished anything as Dr. King had.

I was kind of sarcastic and asked something like, so what did Martin Luther King accomplish other than giving his “I have a dream speech.”

Before I tell you what my father told me, I want to digress. Because at this point in our amnesiac national existence, my question pretty much reflects the national civic religion view of what Dr. King accomplished. He gave this great speech. Or some people say, “he marched.” I was so angry at Mrs. Clinton during the primaries when she said that Dr. King marched, but it was LBJ who delivered the Civil Rights Act.

At this point, I would like to remind everyone exactly what Martin Luther King did, and it wasn’t that he “marched” or gave a great speech.

My father told me with a sort of cold fury, “Dr. King ended the terror of living in the south.”

Please let this sink in and and take my word and the word of my late father on this. If you are a white person who has always lived in the U.S. and never under a brutal dictatorship, you probably don’t know what my father was talking about.

But this is what the great Dr. Martin Luther King accomplished. Not that he marched, nor that he gave speeches.

He ended the terror of living as a black person, especially in the south.

I’m guessing that most of you, especially those having come fresh from seeing The Help, may not understand what this was all about. But living in the south (and in parts of the midwest and in many ghettos of the north) was living under terrorism.

It wasn’t that black people had to use a separate drinking fountain or couldn’t sit at lunch counters, or had to sit in the back of the bus.

You really must disabuse yourself of this idea. Lunch counters and buses were crucial symbolic planes of struggle that the civil rights movement used to dramatize the issue, but the main suffering in the south did not come from our inability to drink from the same fountain, ride in the front of the bus or eat lunch at Woolworth’s.

It was that white people, mostly white men, occasionally went berserk, and grabbed random black people, usually men, and lynched them. You all know about lynching. But you may forget or not know that white people also randomly beat black people, and the black people could not fight back, for fear of even worse punishment.

This constant low level dread of atavistic violence is what kept the system running. It made life miserable, stressful and terrifying for black people.

White people also occasionally tried black people, especially black men, for crimes for which they could not conceivably be guilty. With the willing participation of white women, they often accused black men of “assault,” which could be anything from rape to not taking off one’s hat, to “reckless eyeballing.”

This is going to sound awful and perhaps a stain on my late father’s memory, but when I was little, before the civil rights movement, my father taught me many, many humiliating practices in order to prevent the random, terroristic, berserk behavior of white people. The one I remember most is that when walking down the street in New York City side by side, hand in hand with my hero-father, if a white woman approached on the same sidewalk, I was to take off my hat and walk behind my father, because he had been taught in the south that black males for some reason were supposed to walk single file in the presence of any white lady.

This was just one of many humiliating practices we were taught to prevent white people from going berserk.

I remember a huge family reunion one August with my aunts and uncles and cousins gathered around my grandparents’ vast breakfast table laden with food from the farm, and the state troopers drove up to the house with a car full of rifles and shotguns, and everyone went kind of weirdly blank. They put on the masks that black people used back then to not provoke white berserkness. My strong, valiant, self-educated, articulate uncles, whom I adored, became shuffling, Step-N-Fetchits to avoid provoking the white men. Fortunately the troopers were only looking for an escaped convict. Afterward, the women, my aunts, were furious at the humiliating performance of the men, and said so, something that even a child could understand.

This is the climate of fear that Dr. King ended.

If you didn’t get taught such things, let alone experience them, I caution you against invoking the memory of Dr. King as though he belongs exclusively to you and not primarily to African Americans.

The question is, how did Dr. King do this—and of course, he didn’t do it alone.

(Of all the other civil rights leaders who helped Dr. King end this reign of terror, I think the most under appreciated is James Farmer, who founded the Congress of Racial Equality and was a leader of nonviolent resistance, and taught the practices of nonviolent resistance.)

So what did they do?

They told us: Whatever you are most afraid of doing vis-a-vis white people, go do it. Go ahead down to city hall and try to register to vote, even if they say no, even if they take your name down.

Go ahead sit at that lunch counter. Sue the local school board. All things that most black people would have said back then, without exaggeration, were stark raving insane and would get you killed.

If we do it all together, we’ll be okay.

They made black people experience the worst of the worst, collectively, that white people could dish out, and discover that it wasn’t that bad. They taught black people how to take a beating—from the southern cops, from police dogs, from fire department hoses. They actually coached young people how to crouch, cover their heads with their arms and take the beating. They taught people how to go to jail, which terrified most decent people.

And you know what? The worst of the worst, wasn’t that bad.

Once people had been beaten, had dogs sicced on them, had fire hoses sprayed on them, and been thrown in jail, you know what happened?

These magnificent young black people began singing freedom songs in jail.

That, my friends, is what ended the terrorism of the south. Confronting your worst fears, living through it, and breaking out in a deep throated freedom song. The jailers knew they had lost when they beat the crap out of these young Negroes and the jailed, beaten young people began to sing joyously, first in one town then in another. This is what the writer, James Baldwin, captured like no other writer of the era.

Please let this sink in. It wasn’t marches or speeches. It was taking a severe beating, surviving and realizing that our fears were mostly illusory and that we were free.

Daily Kos :: Most of you have no idea what Martin Luther King actually did 

Reblogging this so I can come back to it in the spring when I teach the Civil Rights Movement to my 5th graders. 

(via copperoranges)

Reblogging this for all the non-black people who like to quote MLK like he’s theirs.

(via heathenist)

(via beyonceprivilege-deactivated201)