yesterdaysprint:

The Evening World, New York, February 3, 1915 

mademoiselleclipon:

Photographer: Alexandre Bui

(via sisterlich-deactivated20210312)

akhjagjfg11223:

ill never forget the dream i had about this show on nickelodeon that was kind of like malcom in the middle and even stevens and it was called Bitchboy Naughty and like every time they went to a commercial it would fade out w/ kids singing “Bitchboy naughtyyyyyy’ i wish u could hear this tune bc its been stuck in my head for months

(via notpietromaximoff)

yesterdaysprint:
“ Independence Daily Reporter, Kansas, August 27, 1906
”

yesterdaysprint:

Independence Daily Reporter, Kansas, August 27, 1906

starryeyedq:

Baby bat learns to fly!

(via vvampirebat)

shiftythrifting:
“this tiny fish-couch. it’s about as big as a human hand. i don’t know what it could possibly be for.
”

shiftythrifting:

this tiny fish-couch. it’s about as big as a human hand. i don’t know what it could possibly be for.

(via shiftythrifting)

scorp1os:
“life advice from rihanna
”

scorp1os:

life advice from rihanna

(via painsomniac-deactivated20190202)

vintagefashionandbeauty:
““Barbie disco girls, 1970s
” ”

vintagefashionandbeauty:

Barbie disco girls, 1970s

(via 3dbabyfromallymcbeal)

Looking Around: (Introduction) Where Most of Us Live

mcmansionhell:

Architecture as a field has always been captivated by the houses of the elite - those who can hire architects, build large and high quality homes, and set trends for the next generations. While it is always enjoyable to look at street after street of high-profile houses and marvel at their fine execution and intricate architectural details, we must keep in mind that these houses are not where most of us live. 

image

Not until the latter half of the 20th century have architectural historians paid attention to the houses of the working and middle classes. This is partially due to the way architectural history has been studied since the Enlightenment as a scientific investigation of a rational, organic, evolutionary progression of different styles across time. 

However this is a rather narrow view of how buildings work, and one that is architect-specific. The overall pool of examples considered to be architecturally significant pales in comparison to the total number of buildings we visit, work, and live in. 

Architectural history and preservation have always preferred buildings left virtually untouched and in pristine condition. For most of us, our houses are not museums - they are places we live - places that grow as we grow. We build additions, decks, and other secondary structures; we enclose our porches in order to add a dining room; we redecorate to our tastes and the styles of today.

Most people live in houses that have been repeated in some form - whether its ‘tract’ housing, prefabricated homes, or rowhouses in cities, we live in places we can afford, with varying degrees of customization to give these homes a touch of our own style. 

image

Photo by Bart Everson (CC BY 2.0)

For as long as they’ve existed, these houses have been derided as the sterility of ‘mass culture.’ I’m sure we’re all familiar with the song “Little Boxes.” This is, ultimately, an elitist critique. The truth is, not everyone can afford an architect. (Though, to be fair, hiring an architect is more feasible than most people think it is.) Still, when so many struggle to put a roof over their and their family’s heads, it is more than a little disingenuous to say that the accommodations of normal people is “not architecture.” 

McMansions are so disappointing to us because they are the homes of the upper and upper-middle classes who used to build houses that were interesting, that set the stylistic trends later codified by architectural history. While they are now included in guides like A Field Guide to American Houses, the usual objectivity is put aside, replaced with an air of disdain, as if to say “this is the best you could come up with?” 

image

In some ways, McMansions have leveled the playing ground of architectural discourse. The wealthy are no longer the tastemakers - they can’t be relied on to build the best looking houses anymore. Their new housing is no longer considered rife for architectural preservation in the same way it was earlier in the 20th century. 

In this landscape, a shift in the discussion to the houses of the rest of us seems warranted. People want to know what’s special about the houses they live in, and the fact those of us in architecture cannot give them an answer most of the time is perhaps why so few people are interested in architecture to begin with. It is a playing field that exists beyond their means. 

The goal of this blog was to use a type of housing everyone is familiar and emotionally invested in (read: angry about) to teach people about architecture, or at least develop within them an architectural sense of humor. 

The truth is, our houses are interesting and they are worthy of the same kind of attention as rambling Queen Annes and expansive, Georgian estates. 

This is a series about our houses. 

(via mcmansionhell)

jointphotographicexportsgroup:

sydneykrukowski:

why is this every straight ~*~kweer~*~ couple on here and on tinder and on okcupid and on twitter and on instagram and on facebook and on linkedin and on google+ and

Hi this is legitimately the funniest thing I’ve seen in like three months

(via motherearthsign)